翻译专业资格(CATTI) (8)
最新试题
亚洲是我们的共同家园。亚洲拥有全球60%以上的人口和30%以上的经济总量， 在世界经济普遍低迷的形势下，亚洲已成为当前世界经济发展高地，是世界上最具发 展潜力的地区之一。同时无须讳言，当前亚洲也面临经济下行压力较大、安全问题复 杂、非传统安全挑战增多等问题。东南亚朋友讲“水涨荷花高”，中国人讲“众人拾 柴火焰高”，都是说明一个道理：只有合作共贏才能办大事、办好事、办长久之事。 亚洲各国只有坚持合作共赢、共同发展，促进文明互鉴、民心相通，激发经济社会发 展活力，才能实现亚洲持久和平与繁荣。新闻传播教育领域的合作是亚洲命运共同体建设的重要组成部分。中国希望加 强亚洲国家尤其是“一带一路”沿线国家之间的相互了解，愿与亚洲各国一道，在各个领域包括亚洲新闻传播教育方面携手共进、共谋发展。
05-14
梵净山被誉为贵州第一山，系武陵山脉的最高峰，位于贵州省铜仁市下辖的江口、印江、松桃三县交界处。它的最高峰凤凰山海拔2572米。站在山顶80多米高的黄金山峰上，视线绝佳：陡峭的石柱支撑着巨大的方形岩石，被称为“万卷书”。这座山以其壮丽的自然景观和亚热带生态的珍稀动植物而闻名。这座山有着丰富的生物多样性和完整性，是4394种植物和2767种动物的家园。1986年梵净山被列为首批国家级自然保护区之一，受到联合国教科文组织“人与生物圈”的保护。早在明朝时，这座山就是佛教圣地，长期以来它与峨眉山、五台山、普陀山、九华山齐名。游客可以饱览云雾缭绕的群山、美丽的植被、陡ill肖的悬崖、回荡的洞穴和古老的桥梁。
05-14
文明是多彩的，人类文明因多样才有交流互鉴的价值。阳光有七种颜色，世界也是多彩的。一个国家和民族的文明是一个国家和民族的集体记忆。人类在漫长的 历史长河中，创造和发展了多姿多彩的文明。从茹毛饮血到田园农耕，从工业革命到信息社会，构成了波澜壮阔的文明图谱，书写了激荡人心的文明华章。“一花独放不是春，百花齐放春满园。”……不论是中华文明，还是世界上存在 的其他文明，都是人类文明创造的成果。我参观过法国卢浮宫，也参观过中国故宫博物院，它们珍藏着千万件艺术珍品， 吸引人们眼球的正是其展现的多样文明成果。文明交流互鉴不应该以独尊某一种文明 或者贬损某一种文明为前提。中国人在2000多年前就认识到了 “物之不齐，物之情也”的道理。推动文明交流互鉴，可以丰富人类文明的色彩，让各国人民享受更富内 涵的精神生活、开创更有选择的未来。
05-14
在人们对空中网络需求不断增长的推动下，总部位于深圳的空中客车中国创新中 心与中国移动公司签署了一项协议，共同开发空中Wi-Fi服务。空客中国创新中心首 席执行官罗岗表示：“该合作将充分利用便携式电子设备使用的优惠政策以及未来的 5G技术，共同开发端到端的一整套解决方案，打造全新的机上高速互联体验。”今年一月，中国民航总局就飞机上使用移动设备这一点放宽了政策。目前乘客可 以在飞机行驶过程中使用开启了飞行模式的手机、平板电脑和笔记本电脑。在接下来 的几年，中国空中Wi-Fi市场将急速增长。由于技术和费用有限，大多数国内航线 至今还没有配备Wi-Fi服务。目前，飞行中的Wi-Fi主要依赖于Ku波段的信号信 道，这使得它很容易受到飞行过程中不稳定的影响。新近的高速空中网基于Ka波段，意味着网速将比目前己有的选择快得多。
05-14
中国的5G商业化己经进入倒计时阶段，最早将于今年年底发布认证，主要城市的主要领域将在2020年前实现5G技术的覆盖。北京市发展改革委员会主任在一场关于改善商业环境的新闻发布会上表示，到2020年，北京的主要地区将覆盖5G技术， 固定宽带网络，千兆LTE接入能力和宽带速率每年下降10%。根据上海市关于在2018—2020年间推进新一代信息基础设施建设的规划，上海还计划在2020年底完成建设智能城市，包括移动通信和固定宽带网络，获得千兆接入能力并启动5G商业化。基于第六版本的因特网协议（IPv6)的网络、智能转换和新型工业互联网也将按计划在上海同时实现大规模部署。电信资深人士表示，目前国内5G技术的研发、建设和大规模现场测试的进展表明，可以在2019年启动5G商业化试验，并在2020年实现5G完全商业化的目标。
05-14
中国共产党十一届三中全会解放了思想，冲破了旧有体制的制约和旧有观念的束缚，打开了中国改革开放的总闸门。从那时起，改革的力量就像洪水一样奔涌而出，为中国冲开了一条富强之路。40年来，中国用无数个“第一”，标记了改革开放的进程，为这一波澜壮阔的历程做出了完美的诠释。1987年，肯德基在北京开业，中国人 第一次不出国门品尝“洋快餐”。1990年，上海证券交易所挂牌营业，标志着中国资本市场正式启动。2001年，中国正式加入WTO,加速融入国际社会，推动经济发展进入全球化的快车道。中国命运的改变始于40年前的那次会议，但40年来中国所取得的巨大进步，却不是一蹴而就，而是中国人民用辛勤的汗水踏踏实实干出来的；改革开放也不是一次变革，而是一条不会停下的发展道路。中国庆祝改革开放40年，也是从新的历史起点上再出发。
05-14
昨晚，中国的嫦娥四号飞船成功登月，降落在地球上看不到的一面，此前没 有其他飞船到达过的地方。这艘在12月初发射的飞船，最近几周都在环游太空，为 “月之暗面”着陆做准备。据新华社官方消息，嫦娥四号成功降落在冯•卡曼（Von Karman）撞击坑内。新华社发布的图片向世界展示了月球背面的样子，我们能在图像 中看到荒凉的金色表层和一个大凹槽。嫦娥四号探测器着陆在太阳系最大的火山口。这次精准着陆将帮助中国为接下来 的月球探索和未来对其他星球的探测打下基础。这次着陆吸引了全世界的目光，其中 就有埃隆•马斯克（Elon Musk）,他在推特上向中国表示祝贺。此次飞行任务只是中 国不断增长的太空探索宏伟目标的一部分。几年前中国就发射过一艘飞船探索月球的其他部分。最近的这次嫦娥四号飞行任务旨在为月球、地球和太阳系的演化研宄提供 第一手数据和线索。中国表示还有探测其他行星的发射任务。
05-14
去年11月，中国共产党召开了第十八次全国代表大会，明确了今后一个时期中国的发展蓝图，提出到2020年国内生产总值和城乡居民人均收入将在2010年的基础上翻一番，在中国共产党建党100年时全面建成小康社会，在新中国成立100年时建成富强 民主文明和谐的社会主义现代化国家。同时，我们也清醒地认识到，作为拥有13亿多人口的发展中大国，中国在发展道路上面临的风险和挑战依然会很大、很严峻，要实现己确定的奋斗目标必须付出持续的艰辛努力。实现中华民族伟大复兴，是近代以来中国人民最伟大的梦想，我们称之为“中国梦”，基本内涵是实现国家富强、民族振兴、人民幸福。中华民族历来爱好和平。近代以来，中国人民蒙受了外国侵略和内部战乱的百年苦难，深知和平的宝贵，最需要在和平环境中进行国家建设，以不断改善人民生活。……
05-14
12月26日，中国国家旅游局（CNTA）在记者招待会上透露，中国己成为世界上最大的出境旅游市场和世界第四大旅游目的地。会议的主题是“‘十三五'期间的旅游业发展”（以下简称“计划”）。旅游业已成为中国国民经济的支柱。2015年，中 国旅游业占国民经济的10.8%。来自CNTA的数据显示，2015年中国的旅游业总收入达到4.13万亿元人民币，游客进行了 40亿次国内旅游、1.17亿次国外旅游。中国吸引了 1.34亿入境游客，旅游业外汇收入约为1136.5亿美元。该“计划”强调稳定增长，旨在使旅游次数年增长10%,旅游总收入年增长11% 和直接旅游投资增长14%。该“计划”的主要目标还包括提高效率、公众满意度并提 高国际影响力。旅游部门将为国民经济贡献12%,为餐饮、住宿、民用航空和铁路客 运贡献85%。根据该“计划”，每年将在旅游部门创造100万个新的工作岗位。
05-14
一个国家选择什么样的治理体系，是由这个国家的历史传承、文化传统、经济 社会发展水平决定的，是由这个国家的人民决定的。我国今天的国家治理体系，是在 我国历史传承、文化传统、经济社会发展的基础上长期发展、渐进改进、内生性演化 的结果。……中华民族是一个兼容并蓄、海纳百川的民族，在漫长历史进程中，不断学习他人的好东西，把他人的好东西化成我们自己的东西，这才形成我们的民族特色。…………民族文化是一个民族区别于其他民族的独特标识。要加强对中华优秀传统文 化的挖掘和阐发，努力实现中华传统美德的创造性转化、创新性发展，把跨越时空、 超越国度、富有永恒魅力、具有当代价值的文化精神弘扬起来，把继承优秀传统文化 又弘扬时代精神、立足本国又面向世界的当代中国文化创新成果传播出去。只要中华 民族一代接着一代追求美好崇高的道德境界，我们的民族就永远充满希望。
05-14
热门试题
Though mindful of its evils, many people believe bureaucracy is unavoidable. Jamie Dimon,the CEO of JP Morgan Chase, remembers an outside adviser who defended it as the ''necessary outcome of complex businesses operating in complex international and regulatory environments". Indeed, since 1983 the number of managers, supervisors,and administrators in the U.S. workforce has grown by more than 100%. Peter Drucker's prediction that today's organizations would have half as many layers and one-third as many managers as their late- 1980s counterparts was woefully off the mark. Bureaucracy has been thriving.Meanwhile, productivity growth has stalled. From 1948 to 2004, U.S. labor productivity among nonfinancial firms grew by an annual average of 2.5%. Since then its growth has averaged just 1.1%. That's no coincidence: Bureaucracy is particularly virulent in large companies, which have come to dominate the U.S. economy. More than a third of the U.S. labor force now works in firms with more than 5,000 employees 一 where those on the front lines are buried under eight levels of management,on average.Some look to start-ups as an antidote. But although firms such as Uber, Airbnb, and Didi Chuxing get a lot of press, these and other unicorns account for a small fraction of their respective economies. And as entrepreneurial ventures scale up, they fall victim to bureaucracy themselves. One fast-growing IT vendor managed to accumulate 600 vice presidents on its way to reaching $4 billion in annual sales.Why is bureaucracy so resistant to efforts to kill it? In part because it works, at least to a degree. With its clear lines of authority, specialized units, and standardized tasks, bureaucracy facilitates efficiency at scale. It's also comfortably familiar,varying little across industries, cultures, and political systems.Despite this, bureaucracy is not inevitable. Since the term was coined, roughly two centuries ago, much has changed. Today's employees are skilled,not illiterate; competitive advantage comes from innovation, not sheer size; communication is instantaneous, not tortuous; and the pace of change is hypersonic, not glacial.These new realities are at last producing alternatives to bureaucracy. Perhaps the most promising model can be found at a company that would not, at first glance, appear to be a child of the digital age. Haier, based in Qingdao, China, is currently the world's largest appliance maker. With revenue of $35 billion, it competes with household names such as Whirlpool, LG, and Electrolux.
The countries that minted the most female college graduates in fields like science, engineering, or math were also some of the least gender-equal countries. According to a paper by Gijsbert Stoet and David Geary, psychologists at Leeds Beckett University and the University of Missouri respectively, this is because the countries that empower women also empower them, indirectly, to pick whatever career they"d enjoy most and be best at."Countries with the highest gender equality tend to be welfare states," they write, "with a high level of social security." Meanwhile, less gender-equal countries tend to also have less social support for people who, for example, find themselves unemployed. Thus, the authors suggest, girls in those countries might be more inclined to choose stem professions, since they offer a more certain financial future than，say, painting or writing.When the experts looked at the "overall life satisfaction" rating of each country — a measure of economic opportunity and hardship — they found that gender-equal countries had more life satisfaction. The life-satisfaction ranking explained 35 percent of the variation between gender equality and women"s participation in stem. That correlation echoes past research showing that the genders are actually more segregated by field of study in more economically developed places.The upshot of this research is neither especially feminist nor especially sad: It’s not that gender equality discourages girls from pursuing science. It’s that it allows them not to if they"re not interested.The findings will likely seem controversial, since the idea that men and women have different inherent abilities is often used as a reason, by some，to argue we should forget trying to recruit more women into the stem fields. But, as the University of Wisconsin gender- studies professor Janet Shibley Hyde put it, that9s not quite what"s happening here."Some would say that the gender stem gap occurs not because girls can"t do science，but because they have other alternatives, based on their strengths in verbal skills," she said. ""In wealthy nations, they believe that they have the freedom to pursue those alternatives and not worry so much that they pay less."Instead, this line of research, if it’s replicated, might hold useful takeaways for people who do want to see more Western women entering stem fields. In this study, the percentage of girls who did excel in science or math was still larger than the number of women who were graduating with stem degrees. That means there’s something in even the most liberal societies that’s nudging women away from math and science, even when those are their best subjects. The women-in-stem advocates could, for starters, focus their efforts on those would-be stem stars.
Historians and many members of the public already know that Winston Churchill often took high-stakes gambles in his political life. Some, like the disastrous Dardanelles campaign — an audacious attempt he masterminded at the Admiralty to seize the straits of Gallipoli and knock Turkey out of the first world war — he got wrong. Others, notably his decision as prime minister in 1940 to hold out against Nazi Germany until America came to rescue Britain, he got spectacularly right. But the extent to which Churchill was a gambler in other spheres of his life has tended not to catch his biographers' attention.Two new books attempt to fill this gap. The first is”No More Champagne” by David Lough, a private-banker-tumed-historian who looks at Churchill's personal finances during the ups and downs of his career. Mr. Lough has trawled through Churchill's personal accounts and found that he was as much a risk-taker when it came to his money as he was when he was making decisions at the Admiralty or in Downing Street.Although Churchill was descended from the Dukes of Marlborough, his parents had “very little money on either side” 一 though that never stopped them living the high life. Neither did it hamper the young Churchill; he spent wildly on everything from polo ponies to Havana cigars, a habit he picked up as a war correspondent in Cuba.It is no wonder, then, that Churchill spent most of his life leaping from one cash flow crisis to another, being perennially behind with his suppliers5 bills. Another new book, “Winston Churchill Reporting”,by Simon Read, an American journalist, looks at one of the ways Churchill eventually paid some of them: writing. Mr. Read investigates how Churchill went from a young army officer cadet to being Britain's highest-earning war correspondent by the age of 25. It was the extent to which the young reporter was willing to take risks on battlefields across the world that marked out his columns from those of his contemporaries.Both books manage to tell their tales of Churchill the adventurer and gambler elegantly.And for a financial biography, Mr. Lough's is a surprising page-turner. But the two authors only briefly link their assessments of Churchill's personality to the important decisions he made in office. Although their stories are worth telling, they have left bigger questions about Churchill to other historians.
An internal briefing document seen by the BBC says the effects of globalisation on advanced economies is "often uneven" and "may have led to rising wage inequality".The bank, which provides loans to developing countries, also says that "adjustment costs",such as helping people who have lost their jobs,have been higher than expected.Dr. Jim Kim, the head of the World Bank, told the BBC that he understood why people were angry in advanced economies despite the fact that free trade was one of the 6tmost powerful" drivers of growth and prosperity."I hear them and they are saying that my life is not better than my parents and my children's life does not look like it's going to be better than mine," he told me."So there is a real concern but the answer is to have more robust social security programmes,so you have a safety net. And then you need to get serious about getting the skills you need for the jobs of the future."Dr. Kim said that 20% of jobs lost in advanced economies could be linked to trade, with the rest down to automation and the need for new skills.He said governments needed to do more to support those who had lost their jobs.Dr. Kim said that if developed countries start throwing up trade barriers, ambitious targets to eradicate poverty by 2030 could be missed because global economic growth would be slower."It will be much,much harder to achieve [the poverty targets],there's no question," Dr. Kim told me. "We can build all the infrastructure we want and we can increase trade among the emerging market countries, [but] at the end of the day if global trade does not grow at a more robust rate, it is going to be very hard to make those targets"I asked him directly if the target could be missed."We very well could, absolutely,it's possible," he said.Proposals to end extreme poverty — defined as anyone living on less than $1.25 a day — were put together by a United Nations committee chaired by David Cameron in 2013.Dr. Kim said that action by organisations like the World Bank, which provides loans to developing countries, as well as the growth of free trade had lifted millions of people out of poverty.He said that international organisations had to do more to explain the advantages of global trade for advanced as well as emerging economies.
The coffee giant is facing uncomfortable questions in Los Angeles, after becoming a go-to spot for the city's homeless population of 44,000, NPR reports.That's because homeless people living in the city have turned to Starbucks as a place to sleep, use the bathroom, charge electronic devices, and use Wi-Fi because it is often the least expensive and most convenient option around.Three Starbucks locations in parts of Los Angeles with large homeless populations have recently closed their bathrooms to customers and non-customers alike in recent months. The company reports the closures are linked to safety concerns, but current and former Starbucks employees told NPR that homeless people's reliance on the bathrooms has been a struggle for the chain.How to best respond to homeless customers, who spend little and at times cause other customers to complain, has been an ongoing challenge for Starbucks.In 2007, a woman was thrown out of a Starbucks because management thought she was homeless. The chain has since tried to be more compassionate toward homeless customers, with the company^ legal team contributing to a handbook dedicated to informing homeless youth of their rights.Many Starbucks bathrooms, especially busy locations in cities, have solved the issue of homeless customers bathing in bathrooms by adding a lock on the bathroom door, making it only accessible for paying customers.Starbucks’ hours and free Wi-Fi have helped make it a haven for homeless customers. While the chain has long hours, many shelters close early in the morning.Libraries in Los Angeles, one of the few providers of free public internet access, have been forced to shorten hours due to budget cuts in recent years. However, an increasing number of entry-level job applications require online applications, making wireless access more important for poor and homeless customers than ever before.Free Wi-Fi has led to a number of unexpected consequences across the restaurant industry in recent years.In March，KFC and McDonald's in Stoke-on-Trent in the UK banned teenage customers after brawls between teens congregating at the fast-food locations to access free Wi-Fi.Starbucks was a leader in the movement to bring Wi-Fi to coffee and restaurant chains, debuting the service in 2002, when many people still relied on Ethernet cables at home to access the Internet. Wi-Fi played a key role in turning Starbucks into what the company calls a “third place,” where people can socialize, work, or relax outside of the home and office.Free Wi-Fi brings new customers to Starbucks, but also new complications. Fourteen years since the chain began rolling out wireless internet, it still seems impossible to have one without the other.
Tolstoy was a member of the Russian nobility,from a family that owned an estate and hundreds of serfs. The early life of the young count was raucous, debauched and violent."I killed men in wars and challenged men to duds in order to kill them," he wrote. "I lost at cards, consumed the labour of the peasants, sentenced them to punishments, lived loosely,and deceived people …so I lived for ten years."But he gradually weaned himself off his decadent, racy lifestyle and rejected the received beliefs of his aristocratic background, adopting a radical, unconventional worldview that shocked his peers. So how exactly might his personal journey help us rethink our own philosophies of life?One of Tolstoy's greatest gifts was his ability and willingness to change his mind based on new experiences. The horrific bloodshed he witnessed while fighting in the Crimean War in the 1850s turned him into a lifelong pacifist. In 1857, after seeing a public execution by guillotine in Paris — he never forgot the thump of the severed head as it fell into the box below — he became a convinced opponent of the state and its laws, believing that governments were not only brutal, but essentially served the interests of the rich and powerful. "The State is a conspiracy," he wrote to a friend. "Henceforth, I shall never serve any government anywhere." Tolstoy was on the road to becoming an anarchist.The most essential life lesson to take away from Tolstoy is to follow his lead and recognise that the best way to challenge our assumptions and prejudices, and develop new ways of looking at the world, is to surround ourselves with people whose views and lifestyles differ from our own. In Resurrection, he pointed out that most people — whether they are politicians, businessmen or thieves — "instinctively keep to the circle of those people who share their views of life and their own place in it". Cosseted within our peer group,we may think it perfectly normal and justifiable to own two homes, or to oppose same-sex marriage, or to bomb countries in the Middle East. We cannot see that such views may be perverse, unjust, or untrue, because we are inside circles of our own making. The challenge is to spread our conversational wings and spend time with those whose values and experiences contrast with our own. Our ultimate task, Tolstoy would advise us, is to journey beyond the perimeters of the circle.
Before our eyes, the world is undergoing a massive demographic transformation. Globally, the number of people age 60 and over is projected to double to more than 2 billion by 2050, and those 60 and over will outnumber children under the age of five.Some in the public and private sector are already taking note — and sounding the alarm. In his first term as chairman of the US Federal Reserve, with the Great Recession looming, Ben Bernanke remarked, “In the coming decades, many forces will shape our economy and our society, but in all likelihood no single factor will have as pervasive an effect as the aging of our population.” Back in 2010, Standard & Poor’s predicted that the biggest influence on “the future of national economic health, public finances, and policymaking” will be “the irreversible rate at which the world’s population is aging”.“While some people are financially capable of retiring,not all are ready to retire,” says the article. “Many older people need to save longer for retirement so they don’t outlive their savings. Others just choose to work longer to continue to remain cognitively engaged and actively contributing to society.”Unfortunately, misconceptions abound about them: older people will get sick and leave，they are a drain on company benefits，they have difficulty adapting to change and lack technology capabilities, they won’t work as hard as younger people and “are just coasting toward retirement”.Because of this, they experience the highest rate of unemployment in the general workforce, and for longer periods of time — double that of younger generations. Surveys consistently show people 50-plus believe they experience age discrimination in the job market. Some refer to this age group as “the new unemployable” .It is no secret that they offer considerable experience and skills, providing an opportunity for employers across all sectors, especially as the growth rate of the workforce slows or even shrinks in the future. And the companies lucky enough to hire them will reap the many benefits afforded to those who “strategically harness the power of generational diversity and build inclusive age-friendly, organizational cultures”.
A recent study by Oxford University estimates that nearly half of all jobs in the US are at risk from automation and computers in the next 20 years. While advancing technologies have been endangering jobs since the start of the Industrial Revolution, this time it is not just manual posts: artificial intelligence — the so-called fourth industrial revolution — promises to change the shape of professional work as well. For instance, lawtech is already proving adept at sorting and analysing legal documents far faster and more cheaply than junior lawyers can. Similarly, routine tasks in accounting are succumbing to AI at the expense of more junior staff.This change is an opportunity to create new and better jobs. Paul Drechsler, who is president of the CBI employers' organisation, is enthusiastic about the future: t6The fourth industrial revolution is the best opportunity that this country has had for decades to leapfrog” in terms of productivity and competitiveness. But he cautions that “the change is happening must faster than the education system”. The next generation will need a new set of skills to survive, let alone thrive, in an AI world. Literacy, numeracy, science and languages are all important, but they share one thing in common: computers are going to be far better than humans at processing these forms of explicit knowledge.The risk is that the education system will be churning out humans who are no more than second-rate computers, so if the focus of education continues to be on transferring explicit knowledge across the generations, we will be in trouble. The AI challenge is not just about educating more AI and computer experts, although that is important. It is also about building skills that AI cannot emulate. These are essential human skills such as teamwork, leadership, listening, staying positive, dealing with people and managing crises and conflict. These are all forms of tacit knowledge, not explicit knowledge. They are know-how skills, not know- what skills. Know-what is easy to transmit across the generations, and is easy to measure. Know-how skills are hard both to transmit and to measure.The employability skills gap is already large, and AI will only make it larger. A McKinsey survey found that 40 per cent of employers cited lack of skills to explain entry- level vacancies in their companies. Sixty per cent said that even graduates were not ready for the world of work.
一个国家选择什么样的治理体系，是由这个国家的历史传承、文化传统、经济 社会发展水平决定的，是由这个国家的人民决定的。我国今天的国家治理体系，是在 我国历史传承、文化传统、经济社会发展的基础上长期发展、渐进改进、内生性演化 的结果。……中华民族是一个兼容并蓄、海纳百川的民族，在漫长历史进程中，不断学习他人的好东西，把他人的好东西化成我们自己的东西，这才形成我们的民族特色。…………民族文化是一个民族区别于其他民族的独特标识。要加强对中华优秀传统文 化的挖掘和阐发，努力实现中华传统美德的创造性转化、创新性发展，把跨越时空、 超越国度、富有永恒魅力、具有当代价值的文化精神弘扬起来，把继承优秀传统文化 又弘扬时代精神、立足本国又面向世界的当代中国文化创新成果传播出去。只要中华 民族一代接着一代追求美好崇高的道德境界，我们的民族就永远充满希望。
12月26日，中国国家旅游局（CNTA）在记者招待会上透露，中国己成为世界上最大的出境旅游市场和世界第四大旅游目的地。会议的主题是“‘十三五'期间的旅游业发展”（以下简称“计划”）。旅游业已成为中国国民经济的支柱。2015年，中 国旅游业占国民经济的10.8%。来自CNTA的数据显示，2015年中国的旅游业总收入达到4.13万亿元人民币，游客进行了 40亿次国内旅游、1.17亿次国外旅游。中国吸引了 1.34亿入境游客，旅游业外汇收入约为1136.5亿美元。该“计划”强调稳定增长，旨在使旅游次数年增长10%,旅游总收入年增长11% 和直接旅游投资增长14%。该“计划”的主要目标还包括提高效率、公众满意度并提 高国际影响力。旅游部门将为国民经济贡献12%,为餐饮、住宿、民用航空和铁路客 运贡献85%。根据该“计划”，每年将在旅游部门创造100万个新的工作岗位。
